ProtonVPN vs AtlasVPN Comparison

Navigating the VPN Landscape: ProtonVPN versus AtlasVPN

The digital security market is flooded with VPN services making bold claims about their capabilities. Many providers boast of being the "fastest" or "most secure" without substantial evidence, leaving consumers vulnerable to selecting subpar services.

Our comprehensive analysis compares ProtonVPN and AtlasVPN across eleven critical categories to help you make an informed decision. This detailed comparison examines security protocols, performance metrics, user experience, and streaming capabilities.

AtlasVPN Highlights:

• Successfully bypasses geo-restrictions on major streaming platforms

• Delivers impressive connection speeds ideal for buffer-free streaming

• No limits on device connections per account

• Comprehensive suite of advanced security features

• Network coverage spanning over 43 countries

• Transparent zero-logs policy commitment

ProtonVPN Advantages:

• Rich selection of specialized privacy features

• Compatible applications across all major operating systems

• Cryptocurrency payment options for enhanced anonymity

• Extensive server network in more than 60 countries worldwide

This comparison will guide you through which service better meets your specific needs for online privacy, streaming access, and overall performance.

Comparing Pricing: ProtonVPN vs AtlasVPN

When evaluating VPN services based on cost, the difference between ProtonVPN and AtlasVPN becomes quite significant depending on your subscription length.

For month-to-month subscribers, ProtonVPN offers a slight advantage at $9.99 compared to AtlasVPN's $10.99. This dollar difference might influence travelers or occasional VPN users who need short-term protection.

The price gap widens dramatically with longer commitments. AtlasVPN's annual plan costs just $3.29 monthly ($39.42 total), while ProtonVPN charges $5.99 monthly for the same period—approximately $32 more annually.

For maximum savings, AtlasVPN's two-year subscription is remarkably affordable at only $2.05 per month, making it one of the market's most budget-friendly options at just $25 annually. ProtonVPN's comparable two-year plan costs $4.99 monthly ($60 annually), more than double AtlasVPN's rate.

Both services provide risk-free trials with 30-day money-back guarantees and offer free versions with identical limitations: three server locations each and no streaming platform access. The free plans make basic privacy protection accessible regardless of financial situation.

Payment flexibility is available with both services accepting credit cards and PayPal. For enhanced anonymity, ProtonVPN accepts Bitcoin, while AtlasVPN supports multiple cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ether, Monero, and Ripple.

The verdict on value: AtlasVPN delivers substantial savings for long-term users with up to 81% discount on their two-year plan, while ProtonVPN offers a more modest 50% savings on the same term length.

When comparing VPN services, the available apps and features significantly impact their utility. ProtonVPN and AtlasVPN both offer applications for major platforms including Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and even Linux, which is less common among VPN providers. Both services are also available for Amazon Fire devices through dedicated apps.

Router compatibility creates a notable distinction between these services. ProtonVPN provides extensive router support with configuration guides for DD-WRT, Tomato, ASUS-WRT, OpenWRT, pfSense, and other firmware options. AtlasVPN lacks this functionality entirely, offering no configuration files or manual setup options for routers.

Browser integration represents another difference. ProtonVPN offers a Chrome extension that functions as a remote control for the main application rather than a standalone proxy, while AtlasVPN doesn't provide any browser extensions.

Both services allow creating VPN-protected virtual WiFi hotspots on Windows or Mac, enabling protection for devices that don't support direct VPN installation.

Connection limits differ significantly between the providers. ProtonVPN permits 10 simultaneous connections, which is generous for most users. AtlasVPN takes this further by offering unlimited simultaneous connections, allowing users to protect every device they own and even share accounts with others.

Regarding core security features, ProtonVPN provides a comprehensive package including DNS leak protection, IPv6 protection, AES encryption, ad blocking, malware filtering, obfuscation capabilities, multi-hop connections, auto-reconnect, and a kill switch on most platforms. Additional features include split tunneling, port forwarding, Tor over VPN support, and full disk encryption on servers.

AtlasVPN, despite being newer (launched in 2019), has rapidly developed its feature set since being acquired by Nord Technologies. It now offers DNS leak protection, a kill switch, malware filtering, ad blocking, split tunneling, multi-hop connections, rotating IPs, and Tor over VPN functionality.

While AtlasVPN provides impressive capabilities for its price point and relative newness, ProtonVPN maintains a more comprehensive overall feature set for users seeking maximum privacy and security options.

Streaming Service Accessibility: ProtonVPN vs AtlasVPN

Both ProtonVPN and AtlasVPN demonstrate strong capabilities when it comes to bypassing geo-restrictions on popular streaming platforms, though with some notable differences in their coverage.

Netflix Compatibility

Both services effectively unblock Netflix US, which remains the primary target for most users seeking content variety. ProtonVPN provides access to additional libraries including UK, India, Italy, Australia, Germany, Canada, Japan, and France. Similarly, AtlasVPN unlocks Netflix in the US, UK, Canada, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain, making them comparable choices for Netflix enthusiasts.

Broader Streaming Platform Support

AtlasVPN demonstrates slightly superior performance across the streaming ecosystem. Our testing confirmed it successfully unblocks Prime Video, Disney+, HBO Max, Hulu, Sky Go, YouTube TV, Peacock, Paramount Plus, Sling TV, ABC, and BBC iPlayer.

ProtonVPN offers more limited coverage, working with Hulu, BBC iPlayer, Channel 4, ITV Hub, and Prime Video. However, it failed to provide access to ABC, Paramount Plus, NBC, and Sky Go during our evaluation.

Sports Streaming Limitations

Neither service currently supports DAZN, which is disappointing for sports enthusiasts who need VPN access to their accounts while traveling or on restricted networks.

Performance in Restricted Regions

For travelers or residents in highly censored regions like China, where western platforms including Google services, social media, and international news sources are blocked, neither VPN offers official support. ProtonVPN has recently developed a Stealth protocol with obfuscation capabilities, but hasn't yet announced full functionality for Chinese users.

Alternative Recommendation

For those specifically needing reliable service in China or seeking the most comprehensive streaming coverage, NordVPN currently offers superior performance across all evaluated categories, with a risk-free 30-day trial period available to new users.

VPN Comparison: Atlas vs Proton

Signing up for either VPN service streamlines the process—select your preferred provider via our links for exclusive discounts

Anonymous subscriptions are achievable with pseudonyms, temporary email addresses, and crypto payments

Both services prioritize user-friendly installation with compact apps that consume minimal system resources and guided setup processes

Cross-platform compatibility spans desktop (Windows, macOS, Linux) and mobile devices, with dedicated FireTV apps accessible through Amazon’s store

AtlasVPN shines in instant usability: critical tools like WireGuard, ad blockers, and malware shields activate automatically

Server interfaces categorize locations alphabetically and highlight streaming-optimized nodes for hassle-free entertainment access

Configuration menus simplify advanced options—split tunneling requires just a few clicks without technical jargon

ProtonVPN adopts a more educational approach, embedding explanatory tooltips to demystify features like multi-hop connections

Its interface combines map-based server selection with traditional lists, appealing to visual learners

Advanced split tunneling allows IP-based exclusions, though newcomers might initially overlook this niche capability

While AtlasVPN’s plug-and-play design suits tech novices, ProtonVPN balances complexity with intuitive layouts

Both providers prove that sophistication doesn’t sacrifice accessibility—even intricate features remain approachable for casual users

When choosing a VPN, global server coverage is key for unlocking region-specific content.

AtlasVPN offers around 750 servers across 44 nations, with 7 U.S. locations.

While smaller than competitors, its network has grown steadily since joining Nord Tech’s portfolio, suggesting future expansion.

ProtonVPN boasts over 1,750 servers in 64 countries, including 14 U.S. cities.

This extensive reach makes it ideal for accessing hyperlocal services like city-based news sites or college sports streams blocked outside certain states.

Server location highlights:

– ProtonVPN: 64 countries, heavy U.S. presence, optimized for regional unblocking

– AtlasVPN: 44 countries, expanding footprint, streamlined for essential geo-spoofing

More servers mean more flexibility—whether evading censorship laws or streaming international platforms.

A detailed server list comparison can help pinpoint which VPN aligns with your virtual location needs.

Performance benchmarking for VPNs involves rigorous multi-region speed tests

to simulate real-world usage across activities like streaming and file transfers

Our evaluations cover servers in the US, UK, and Hong Kong to establish balanced global metrics

Recent speed trials revealed striking parity between ProtonVPN and AtlasVPN

Both delivered near-identical global download averages - 245 Mbps vs 247 Mbps respectively

Such speeds comfortably support HD video streaming, large file downloads, and online gaming

AtlasVPN's edge comes from WireGuard protocol implementation as its default configuration

ProtonVPN maintains competitive velocities through optimized server infrastructure

Neither service left users wanting for bandwidth-heavy applications

While both providers excel, budget-conscious users might explore alternatives

NordVPN (369 Mbps) and Surfshark (324 Mbps) outpace these contenders while offering lower pricing tiers

The speed hierarchy demonstrates premium performance often comes at higher subscription costs

When evaluating privacy tools, encryption standards and protocol selection often dictate reliability. Both services leverage military-grade AES-256 ciphering, but diverge in architectural philosophy.

AtlasVPN embraces modern efficiency, exclusively deploying WireGuard and IKEv2 – protocols lauded for speed without compromising security. WireGuard’s streamlined codebase minimizes vulnerability risks, while ChaCha20-Poly1305 integration optimizes mobile performance.

Conversely, ProtonVPN caters to traditionalists with OpenVPN configurations, appealing to users prioritizing audited legacy systems. Its custom stealth protocol masks VPN traffic as standard HTTPS streams, a boon for bypassing advanced network filters.

Leak prevention proves robust across both platforms, with zero IP/DNS exposures detected during testing. ProtonVPN extends IPv6 safeguards and platform-specific kill switches, including iOS integration – a rarity in the industry. AtlasVPN counters with consistent kill-switch performance across all apps, ensuring uninterrupted protection during connection drops.

Torrenting viability exists in both ecosystems, though ProtonVPN’s Swiss jurisdiction and RAM-only servers offer legal advantages for sensitive data handling. AtlasVPN shines in latency-sensitive scenarios, with WireGuard enabling buffer-free 4K streaming and competitive gaming responsiveness.

Ultimately, protocol flexibility versus cutting-edge optimization defines this matchup, catering to distinct user priorities within the encrypted tunnel landscape.

VPN Services: Jurisdiction & Support

Jurisdiction and Privacy Considerations for VPN Services

When selecting a VPN provider, the legal jurisdiction under which they operate plays a crucial role in determining how your data might be handled.

Switzerland serves as the home base for ProtonVPN, offering significant advantages for privacy-conscious users. Swiss privacy laws provide robust protection, and the country doesn't impose data retention requirements on VPN services. Transparency is maintained through regular reports that notify users of any legal requests received from Swiss authorities.

Following its acquisition by Nord Technologies, AtlasVPN now operates from Panama. This jurisdiction is favorable for privacy services as it lacks intrusive surveillance agencies and mandatory data retention laws that would affect VPN operations.

Regarding logging practices, ProtonVPN implements a zero-logs policy for user activities. While they do record minimal connection data (specifically the timestamp of your most recent connection), this information cannot be used to determine your online activities.

For enhanced anonymity, ProtonVPN supports Bitcoin payments, allowing users to register using temporary email addresses if desired.

AtlasVPN also maintains a strict no-logs policy, avoiding the collection of browsing activities, source IP addresses, or connection timestamps. However, they do collect certain device information including model specifications, operating system details, and advertising identifiers to monitor service engagement.

Though the collection of device-level data by AtlasVPN isn't ideal from a privacy perspective, it's important to note that this information cannot be used to identify specific online activities or facilitate correlation attacks.

When comparing IP address management between ProtonVPN and AtlasVPN, both services utilize shared IP systems. This approach combines your traffic with numerous other users, enhancing anonymity and making individual activity tracking significantly more difficult.

DNS handling is a privacy strength for both providers. They process DNS requests through their proprietary servers, preventing your ISP from monitoring these requests. Both implement robust DNS leak protection systems to maintain your privacy integrity.

Gamers will appreciate the inherent DDoS protection offered by both services. By masking your actual IP address, these VPNs prevent potential attackers from targeting your connection during competitive online gaming sessions.

Network security features include NAT firewalls on both platforms, blocking unwanted incoming traffic. ProtonVPN offers additional flexibility with optional NAT disabling to facilitate port forwarding when needed.

It's worth noting that neither service provides dedicated static IP addresses. Users requiring this specific feature would need to explore alternative VPN providers.

Performance metrics show impressive results from both services, with download speeds averaging approximately 250 Mbps through their tier 1 server networks. While ProtonVPN maintains a broader global server presence, both services cover the primary regions where gaming servers are typically hosted.

Device compatibility is comprehensive across Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android platforms. Console gamers can utilize either service by creating VPN-protected virtual WiFi hotspots. ProtonVPN offers additional flexibility through router compatibility for whole-network protection.

AtlasVPN takes the lead in user assistance with exclusive 24/7 live chat access for paying members, a feature absent in ProtonVPN’s support structure. While both services prioritize self-help resources, their approaches to direct communication diverge sharply.

Comprehensive knowledge bases are a shared strength, offering device-specific installation tutorials and troubleshooting FAQs. These repositories empower users to resolve common issues without immediate staff intervention.

Beyond technical guides, each provider maintains an educational blog focused on cybersecurity trends and data protection strategies. These articles cater to both novices and tech-savvy readers seeking deeper digital privacy insights.

The critical divergence emerges in real-time support options. AtlasVPN’s subscriber-only chat enables instant query resolution, contrasting with ProtonVPN’s email-ticket system that inherently involves waiting periods. Response time comparisons reveal this operational difference – while AtlasVPN addresses concerns immediately during live sessions, ProtonVPN’s email responses typically arrive within several hours depending on inquiry complexity.

AtlasVPN gains a clear advantage over ProtonVPN with its 24/7 live chat availability

Both providers demonstrated comparable email response speeds during testing

While email support performance was nearly identical

real-time assistance options ultimately tipped the scales in AtlasVPN’s favor

ProtonVPN’s lack of instant support channels remains a notable drawback

despite matching AtlasVPN’s email reply efficiency

AtlasVPN vs ProtonVPN Comparison

After extensively evaluating ProtonVPN and AtlasVPN across 11 critical categories, our analysis reveals that AtlasVPN offers superior value for typical VPN users, though the competition was remarkably close.

AtlasVPN demonstrated excellence in three key areas: customer support efficiency, cost-effectiveness with better discounts, and superior streaming capabilities with access to more platforms. ProtonVPN distinguished itself primarily in one area - feature richness.

The services performed identically in seven categories: user interface and setup process, functionality in China, server distribution and performance metrics, gaming experience, configuration options, privacy protections, and security implementations.

Both providers deliver comparable privacy and security standards, with negligible differences in connection speeds. While streaming performance was similar, AtlasVPN managed to unblock more entertainment services during our testing.

ProtonVPN's advantage lies in its advanced feature set, making it potentially more suitable for users with specialized needs. If specific capabilities like port forwarding are essential to your usage, ProtonVPN's 30-day money-back guarantee provides a risk-free trial period.

However, considering AtlasVPN's significantly more affordable pricing structure combined with its well-rounded performance across all testing categories, most users will find AtlasVPN offers the better overall value proposition.

What is a Netflix VPN and How to Get One

A Netflix VPN is a service that enables viewers to bypass geographic restrictions by masking their real location through encrypted connections to servers worldwide. It primarily helps users unlock diverse Netflix libraries, offering access to shows and movies unavailable in their home regions. By using a Netflix VPN, subscribers can enhance their streaming experience with expanded content options while maintaining privacy.

Why Choose SafeShell as Your Netflix VPN?

If you're experiencing Netflix vpn not working issues and want to access region-restricted content, SafeShell VPN offers a compelling solution worth considering. This exceptional service provides numerous advantages that enhance your streaming experience:

1. High-speed servers specifically optimized for Netflix ensure buffer-free playback and high-definition streaming, eliminating frustrating interruptions during your favorite shows.
   
2. Multi-device functionality allows simultaneous connections on up to five devices across Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Apple TV, Android TV, and even Apple Vision Pro.
   
3. The innovative App Mode feature uniquely enables access to multiple regional content libraries simultaneously, expanding your entertainment options significantly.
   
4. Lightning-fast connection speeds with no bandwidth limitations provide unprecedented performance for streaming without buffering or throttling.
   
5. The proprietary "ShellGuard" VPN protocol delivers top-level security for private browsing, keeping your online activities protected.
   
6. A flexible free trial plan lets you experience all SafeShell VPN benefits before committing to a subscription.
   

A Step-by-Step Guide to Watch Netflix with SafeShell VPN

To start using SafeShell Netflix VPN , the first step is to subscribe to the service. Visit the SafeShell VPN website and select a plan that suits your needs and budget. Once you've chosen your plan, click the "Subscribe Now" button to complete the subscription process. After subscribing, go to the SafeShell VPN website and download the app or software for your device, whether it’s a Windows PC, macOS, iOS, or Android. Install the downloaded file on your device to get ready for the next steps.

Once the installation is complete, open the SafeShell VPN app and log in with your account credentials. For the best experience with Netflix, it's recommended to use the APP mode. Next, browse the list of available servers and select one located in the region whose Netflix content you want to access, such as the US, UK, or Canada. Click on "Connect" to establish a secure connection. Finally, open the Netflix app or visit the Netflix website, log in with your Netflix account, and enjoy streaming content from the selected region.